State Highway Department v. Calhoun
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The first two enumerations of error are as to the refusal of the trial court to exclude the evidence of a witness who testified concerning the sales of two nearby tracts of one acre each as a basis of giving his opinion of value as to the 47 acres of land involved in the condemnation proceeding.
While the size, shape, contours and the like are matters for consideration in determining whether comparability exists, these are not exclusive. It is difficult to find comparables, and might well be impossible if the rule were restricted to the sale of tracts of the same size as that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hard v. Housing Authority of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Fulton County v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Osteen v. OsteenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Department of Transportation v. KendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Jackson v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- State Highway Department v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Donehoo v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.