Legal Opinion

Speerin v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 15, 1985No. 80 Civ. 4231 (JES)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge:

Plaintiff Thomas Speerin, an employee of Ardell Engineering Marine Repair Corp. (“Ardell”), commenced this action against defendant Prudential Lines, Inc. (“Prudential”) to recover damages for injuries which he allegedly sustained while working as a pipe fitter aboard Prudential’s vessel, the S.S. Santa Barbara. Defendant moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Since matters outside the pleadings have been presented to and have not been excluded by the Court, the motion shall be treated as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Pallas Shipping Agency, Ltd. v. DurisSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Frederico Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd. And Djakarta Lloyd, P.N.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Ramon Costa v. Danais Shipping Company and Kratigos Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Brunetti v. Cape Canaveral Shipping Co., SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API