Legal Opinion

People v. Donald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Muskegon. Information for embezzlement. Eespondent was convicted.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The respondent in this case was found guilty upon the following information:

*492Slate of Michigan, Gonnty of Musltegon. ss.

The circuit court for the county of Muskegon.

Nelson De Long, prosecuting attorney for the county of Muskegon aforesaid, for and in behalf of the People of the State of Michigan, comes into said court in the January term thereof, A. D. 1882, and gives it here to understand and be informed that Robert M. Donald, late of the city of Muskegon in the county of Muskegon and State of Michigan, heretofore, to wit, on the first day of November, in the year one thousand eight hundred…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Firestone v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. People v. WallerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. In re PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API