Legal Opinion · Dissent

Voorhees v. Hudson River Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1905Published

1Dissent

CHESTER, J. (dissenting).

There was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence to justify the submission of that question to the jury. Its manager knew that the old pole had fallen and had been reset. It was not sufficient under such circumstances to tell the deceased that the pole was an old one and to be careful 'and not take any chances. The mere fact that the deceased was sent to replace the wires from one pole to the other would be sufficient notice to him that one was an old pole, without the manager telling him that fact; but the manager knew that che pole had rotted off and had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irish v. Union Bag & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Irish v. Union Bag & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API