Legal Opinion
Foreman v. J. Walter Construction Co. (In Re Foreman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided November 26, 2007No. 15-30089PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULES
JOHN S. DALIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
By motion, Avis M. Foreman (“Debtor”) seeks to amend the schedules in her Chapter 13 case to reflect her interest in a wrongful death claim that arose post-confirmation. Because the tort claim arose post-confirmation it is not property of the estate; and because Debtor has no ongoing duty to disclose assets acquired post-confirmation that are not property of the estate, Debtor’s motion to amend her bankruptcy schedules is DENIED as unnecessary and improper. For the same reasons Defendants’ Objection is OVERRULED.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re WetzelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- In Re RangelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- In re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Thompson v. QuarlesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2008
- Wilborn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Wilborn)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.