DeRose v. Bloomingdale's Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Acosta, J.P.
This appeal underscores the importance of Labor Law § 240 (l)’s protection of construction workers who are not provided with adequate safety devices. Because plaintiff’s supervisor explicitly directed him not to use an otherwise available Baker scaffold, and defendant does not dispute that a Baker scaffold would have been the adequate device for plaintiff to engage in the required demolition work, plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment on defendant’s liability where he used an inadequate A-frame ladder and was injured in a resulting fall.
Plaintiff is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Robinson v. East Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wilinski v. 334 East 92nd Housing Development Fund Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.