McNamara v. Droesch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Where a fraud claim gives rise to damages which are not separate and distinct from those flowing from an alleged medical malpractice cause of action, it must be dismissed (see Bellera v Handler, 284 AD2d 488, 490 [2001]). Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the cause of action alleging fraud, and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the injuries arising from the alleged fraud differed from those caused by the alleged malpractice. Accordingly, the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bellera v. HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Degroof v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Andrade v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Brenner v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Harja v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012