Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Droesch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Where a fraud claim gives rise to damages which are not separate and distinct from those flowing from an alleged medical malpractice cause of action, it must be dismissed (see Bellera v Handler, 284 AD2d 488, 490 [2001]). Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the cause of action alleging fraud, and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the injuries arising from the alleged fraud differed from those caused by the alleged malpractice. Accordingly, the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bellera v. HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Degroof v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Andrade v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Brenner v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Harja v. MilhoratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API