Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1980No. 2-979A271PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Luther Young (Young) challenges the revocation of the suspension of sentences *1085imposed following his guilty plea to the charges of Unlawful Use of a Credit Card and Uttering a Forged Instrument.

We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

The evidence most favorable to the State indicates the following:

On September 2, 1976, Young was charged by information with Unlawful Use of a Credit Card and Uttering a Forged Instrument. On November 3, 1976, Young entered a guilty plea to both charges, and was given two concurrent sentences of one year, and two to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Apple Oakes v. Greenfield Banking Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Starkie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Baldock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Stuck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Pawloski v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Castro v. CastroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Castro v. CastroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API