Legal Opinion

Cobble v. T-Mobile Sprint

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 22, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00415Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION DANIEL COBBLE, ET AL. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-000415-RGJ-RSE T-MOBILE SPRINT, ET AL. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant T-Mobile Sprint (“Sprint”) moves to compel arbitration. [DE 1-1 at 44-125]. Plaintiffs Daniel Cobble (“Mr. Cobble’) and Rufina Cobble (“Mrs. Cobble”) (collectively, “the Cobbles”), responded, [DE 8], and Sprint replied, [DE 11]. Mr. Cobble individually filed four other motions: a “Motion to Return Case to State Court,” [DE 9], a “Motion for the Court to Report…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API