Legal Opinion

Hochman v. Zigler's, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 4, 1946No. Docket 147/118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, Hochman, had a store in premises leased for a term which expired December 31st, 1945. His landlord, Zigler's Incorporated, refused to renew the lease but permitted him to remain in possession as a tenant from month to month. In February, Leo Zigler, president of Zigler's Incorporated, told Hochman that they were unwilling to have him as a tenant, that he would have to get out by April 1st. Hochman pleaded in vain. His store had a going concern value around $10,000, but was worth only about $500 on liquidation, since the stock in trade was small and the fixtures were specially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  2. Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  4. Second Nat. Bank of Paterson v. CurieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. Capasso v. ColonnaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Borbely v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  3. Blanton v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In Re Blanton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  4. Bell v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. SP Dunham & Co. v. KudraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API