King v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.
Appellant challenges an enhanced penalty which was imposed after his conviction for assault on a law enforcement officer. The trial court found appellant to be an “habitual misdemeanant” based upon prior convictions for robbery and manslaughter.
Section 775.084(l)(b)1 permits an enhanced penalty only when the defendant has been convicted twice previously of the same crime. Hysmith v. State, 374 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Neither of the previous convictions were for the same crime.
Defendant’s sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentencing.
DAUKS…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hysmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. AM. ARBITRATION ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Worthy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982