Legal Opinion

Kennedy Development Co. v. Camp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 21, 2011No. S11G0274PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari to examine whether the “anti-indemnity” statute found at OCGA § 13-8-2 (b) applies to invalidate an indemnification clause within an assignment and assumption agreement transferring responsibility for the management and operation of a newly developed subdivision to its homeowners’ association. See Newton’s Crest Homeowners’ Assn. v. Camp, 306 Ga. App. 207 (702 SE2d 41) (2010). We now hold that OCGA § 13-8-2 (b) does apply to the assignment and assumption agreement, and, therefore, we affirm.

The undisputed evidence establishes that appellees…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frazer v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. McEver v. Planners & Engineers Collaborative, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Country Club Apartments, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. City of Atlanta v. HOTELS. COM.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. National Candy Wholesalers, Inc. v. Chipurnoi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hankla v. PostellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Spectera, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Milliken & Co. v. Ga. Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Lakeview Behavioral Health System, LLC v. UHS Peachford, LPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Kennedy Development Co. v. Newton's Crest Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API