Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grosser v. Boy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1975No. 74-1067PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend that the records which they desire to examine are “public records” within the purview of E. C. 149.43, and, therefore, are required to be available for inspection.

E. C. 149.43 states:

“As used in this section, ‘public record’ means any record required to be kept by any governmental unit, including, but not limited to, state, county, city, village, township and school district units, except records pertaining to physical or psychiatric examinations, adoption, probation, and parole proceedings, and records the release of which is prohibited by state or federal law.
“All public…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wooster Republican Printing Co. v. City of WoosterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Milo's Beauty Supply Co. v. State Board of CosmetologyOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API