Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

COLINS, President Judge.

Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) has filed exceptions1 from the January 12, 1996 opinion and order of this Court, affirming three orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board) that determined Conrail’s capital stock tax liability for the periods ending April 2,1987, April 30,1987, and April 30, 1988, and that rejected Conrail’s method of calculating its average net income and net worth for those foregoing time periods.

For each time period, the capital stock value calculated by Conrail was not accepted by the Department of Revenue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kalodner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Electric Power Service Corporation v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Glenn Johnston, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Scholastic Services Organization, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Marshall v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Miller v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API