In re Sebald

The opinion in this case was handed down on March 6, 1944, and we are granting a rehearing upon petition of appellant, for the pur*1149pose of correcting an error relating to claim 13. There were but two claims involved, claims 8 and 13. Appellant does not insist, in Ms petition for.rehearing, that we should again consider claim 3, but he does strenuously urge that we should give consideration to claim 13. We adopt, as part of our decision here, the following from our former opinion:

Appellant lias here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office which…