Legal Opinion

Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Homewood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1912No. 1442PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; George C. Abernathy, Judge. Action by Harry Homewood against the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This was an action on a fire insurance policy by Harry Homewood, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the Springfield Eire & Marine Insurance Company,' hereinafter called defendant, to recover for the burning of a certain private car, known as “Gertrude,” the property of the plaintiff. The policy was issued September 10, 1907, for one year, and the loss occurred on the.27th of November, 1907, at Tecumseh, in this state.

There are only two questions raised by defendant’s brief: First. That the loss was not appraised before the suit was brought, as provided by the policy. It…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Oshkosh Gas Light Co. v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Reilly v. Franklin Insurance Co. of St. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. GarlingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ozburn v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Palatine Ins. Co. of London v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Garland Coal & Mining Company v. Clifton FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. DickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API