Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Ardillo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1941No. 2211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORE, Judge.

This is a suit upon a promissory note' made and executed by defendants Floyd, Leroy and Nick Ardillo, and endorsed by ■ defendant T. T. Mayer, bearing date of June 9, 1932, maturing on May 22, 1933, for the principal sum of $220.65, bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum from maturity until paid.

Plaintiff alleges that it is the holder and owner, for value before maturity, as pledgee of the said note, and alleges that, the interest on the said note had been paid to November 22, 1933; plaintiff prays for a judgment in solido against the defendants. Nick Ardillo died prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. SummonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Stovall v. TolarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Heard v. Heard.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. H. J. Cottam & Co. v. RaphaelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Thomson Gin Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of New Iberia v. RomeroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Begnaud v. CefaluLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API