Legal Opinion

State v. Gant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 27, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRxsoN, J.

The questions involved, as contended by defendant Surety Company, will be considered seriatim.(1) Is this a summary proceeding such as is provided for by C. S., 356, or is it a civil action and should it have been commenced by summons, as directed by C. S., 475, and subject to the statutes otherwise controlling civil actions? We think this is a summary proceeding as is provided for by 0. S., 356.

C. S., 475, provides for civil actions which shall be commenced by summons. We see no reason, from the facts in this case, why plaintiffs could not pursue the summary remedy under 0. S., 356 or bring…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Sykes Ex Rel. Sykes v. BlakeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. In re GantDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API