Legal Opinion

State v. Lail

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1979No. 7827SC1167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant’s argument that hearsay testimony was admitted is without merit. None of the testimony which defendant challenges under this assignment of error falls within the definition of hearsay, that is, an assertion of a person other than the witness which is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. 1 Stansbury’s N.C. Evidence § 138 (Brandis rev. 1973). Two of the challenged statements are testimony as to what the witness told the defendant, the third is not an assertion, and the fourth is not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted but merely to prove that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. RatliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CullorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. MyersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API