Boehringer v. Schmid
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.
This is an action for partition of real property and squarely presents the following questions for determination: Can a husband, seized in fee of real property, deed to himself and wife and thereby create in such husband and wife an estate by the entirety?
*237If not, is such a deed void or does it create a joint tenancy or tenancy in common?
The facts herein are without dispute. One Joseph Schmid and his wife, Theresia Schmid, became seized in 1886 as tenants by the entirety of the real property herein sought to be partitioned. The said Theresia Schmid thereafter died, and the fee vested in Joseph…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Law, of the Estate of LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In re Transfer Tax upon the Estate of HorlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Cadgene v. CadgeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Brown v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Cadgene v. CadgeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Lipps v. CroweNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.