Legal Opinion

Sommers v. Putnam County Board on Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925No. 18894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

By an error of the printer, the third paragraph of the syllabus in the case of State, ex rel. Masters, v. Beamer, 109 Ohio St., 133, has been incorrectly published in that volume. The third paragraph of the syllabus, as printed in 109 Ohio St., 133, is as follows:

“3. If a board of education in a district fails to provide sufficient school privileges for all the youth of school age in the district, including the privilege of having high school branches offered at some school within 4 miles of the district, including the privilege of having high school age ini the district, or of having such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Ind. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Bruggeman v. Independent School District No. 4, Union TownshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Lanni v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Halliday v. MarchingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Rysdam v. School District No. 67 of Union CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API