Legal Opinion

Rose v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1981No. Nos. 53418, 53419 consPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Two employees of respondent Hyster Company were injured playing “flag football” and sought compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.). An arbitrator for the Industrial Commission awarded compensation. The Commission, however, found the injuries did not arise “out of and in the course of” employment and denied compensation. The circuit court of Vermilion County confirmed the Commission, and the employees appealed to this court under our Rule 302(a) (73 Ill. 2d R. 302(a)).

In the first of these consolidated cases, cause No. 53418, Marvin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Keystone Steel & Wire Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gunthrop-Warren Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API