Legal Opinion

Copperman v. Brooks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1956No. 23651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By DOYLE, J:

An appeal on questions of law was taken to this Court from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County which granted a motion for new trial pursuant to the rendition of a judgment for the defendant upon the verdict of a jury. The new trial was granted for *128the reason that the judgment is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.

The sole assignment oí error is in the following words: “The trial court committed error prejudicial to the rights of the defendant in entering an order granting plaintiff’s motion for new trial.”

At the threshold of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grosser v. Armet Alloys, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hiboluk v. PozniakowOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Charnier v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Garland v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API