Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Stern
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 19, 2010No. 02-56002PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER; Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
This case returns to us after the Supreme Court determined that we had construed too broadly the “probate exception” to our subject matter jurisdiction. Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293, 126 S.Ct. 1735, 164 L.Ed.2d 480 (2006). Confident that we have subject matter jurisdiction over this case, id.; 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we turn to the merits of the longstanding and acrimonious dispute.
This case involves a tort claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against E. Pierce Marshall, the son of her late husband J. Howard Marshall II,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. ArkisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Elaine Marshall v. J. Marshall, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. SharifCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Battle Ground Plaza, LLC v. Ray (In Re Ray)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.