Legal Opinion
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Alvin Barker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-30121, 93-30128PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
A grand jury in the District of Oregon indicted Alvin Barker for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Through a motion in li-mine, Barker requested bifurcation of his trial. Specifically, he moved to bifurcate the “possession” element of the crime from the “felon” element of the crime. The district court granted Barker’s motion to bifurcate; the United States appeals the district court’s order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, or in the alternative, through a petition for mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). We grant the petition for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Wayne N. Collamore, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Kevin GilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kenneth Howard KoskelaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State v. HarbaughSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- United States v. Douglas Paul BreitkreutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.