Legal Opinion

Lichau v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 2000No. CV960127; CA A97504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner based on inadequate assistance of trial counsel. Petitioner “cross-appeals,” arguing that the trial court erred on all issues decided adversely to him. We review for errors of law, reverse on appeal, and affirm on cross-appeal.

Petitioner was indicted on six counts for the rape, sodomy, and sexual abuse of his 11-year-old niece in June 1989. The victim testified that the attacks took place on two separate nights at petitioner’s parents’ house, in a bedroom 12 feet away from the living room where the parents…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API