Simonds v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Brett Simonds appeals his convictions of aggravated burglary and of interference with a peace officer and the determination that he was a habitual criminal.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Appellant raises the following issues:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY REFUSING TO INSTRUCT THE JURY AS TO APPELLANT’S THEORY OF SELF-DEFENSE TO THE CHARGES OF INTERFERENCE WITH A PEACE OFFICER AND AGGRAVATED BURGLARY.
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT SENTENCED APPELLANT UNDER THE ENHANCED HABITUAL CRIMINAL STATUTE BY USING…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- William C. Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Neilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Rodarte Ex Rel. Rodarte v. City of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Davis v. Balkcom, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. MyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Chavez-Becerra v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Yetter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- DeSpain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. AumanColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.