Legal Opinion

In re Mahoney

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1990Published

1Per curiam

The District Ethics Committee (DEC) found respondent, John J. Mahoney, guilty by clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct in his handling of the matters of four clients over a period of more than two years. Agreeing with the DEC’S findings of unethical conduct, the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) recommended that we impose a three-months suspension. The DRB further recommended a one-year proctorship of respondent on his return to the practice. We disagree with the recommendation and deliver instead this public reprimand.

As the DRB observed, the four matters that give rise to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of KasdanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API