Ring v. . King

The case as stated by his Honor was as follows: Two questions were made in this cause; the first as to boundary and the other upon the statute of limitations. The plaintiff offered in evidence a grant to John Waggoner dated in 1784, the calls of which were admitted to be A, B, C, as represented on the annexed diagram. From C the distance called for would terminate at F, and a line from that point to the beginning would not include the locus in quo; but the plaintiff contended (302) that he had the right to go to D, as the true terminus, and from thence to A, which would cover the place of the…