Legal Opinion

Montesinos v. Zapata

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 2010No. 3D08-2858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, Alicia Montesinos and Hughette Esquivel (collectively “Appellants”), appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Javier Zapata (“Zapata”) and from post-trial orders denying their motions for a new trial, re-mittitur, and judgment in accordance with motion for directed verdict and/or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

An appellate court reviews a trial court’s denial of a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion. Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490, 498 (Fla.1999); SDG Dadeland Assocs., Inc. v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Kloster Cruise Ltd. v. GrubbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. BellaicheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Fitzsimmons v. Biomet OrthopedicsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API