Legal Opinion

Damon Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1934No. 21886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal is from the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, in a suit wherein the defendant in error, Rose D. Hoffman, was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error, Damon Mutual Benefit Association, a corporation, was the defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff’s suit was based upon a policy of insxirance issued by the defendant on the life of her husband, Cornelius Hoffman, plaintiff being the beneficiary named in said policy. Plaintiff alleges in her amended petition that the defendant is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Modern Brotherhood of America v. BesharaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. J. P. Lamb & Co. v. Merchants National Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. American Insurance Union v. CowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API