Legal Opinion

Davis, Steele & Co. v. Eppler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from. Republic District Court. Action to recover upon a promissory note. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

This cause was tried in the Republic district court, at the January term, 1886, by the court, without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of Davis, Steele & Co. against N. Harper and J. T. Harper, and in favor of C. Eppler against Davis, Steele & Co. for his costs. No special findings were made by the court. Davis, Steele & Co. bring the case here for review. This action was brought upon a promissory note, executed by N. Harper and J. T. Harper, March 11, 1884, and due January 11, 1885; John Farrell was the nominal payee; he indorsed the note to C. Eppler, who was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. FrickeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. State Savings Bank v. ShafferNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Andrews v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  4. Farmer v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Barton Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. M. Schwartz & Sons v. WilmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Edington v. McLeodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Sheley v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API