Davis, Steele & Co. v. Eppler
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from. Republic District Court. Action to recover upon a promissory note. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
This cause was tried in the Republic district court, at the January term, 1886, by the court, without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of Davis, Steele & Co. against N. Harper and J. T. Harper, and in favor of C. Eppler against Davis, Steele & Co. for his costs. No special findings were made by the court. Davis, Steele & Co. bring the case here for review. This action was brought upon a promissory note, executed by N. Harper and J. T. Harper, March 11, 1884, and due January 11, 1885; John Farrell was the nominal payee; he indorsed the note to C. Eppler, who was the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank v. FrickeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- State Savings Bank v. ShafferNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Andrews v. SimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Farmer v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Barton Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- M. Schwartz & Sons v. WilmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Edington v. McLeodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Sheley v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896