Legal Opinion

Shimek v. Shimek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1988No. 87-486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

Appellant husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, alleging that the trial court erred in (1) requiring appellant to secure the payment of alimony by an unencumbered life insurance policy naming the wife as beneficiary; and (2) ordering appellant to pay the wife’s attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm.

This court has recently held that under Section 61.08(3), Florida Statutes (1985),1 a trial court may, where the circumstances so warrant, require a party who is ordered to pay alimony to purchase or maintain a life insurance policy to secure such alimony.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fiveash v. FiveashDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. McMath v. McMathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Shimek v. ShimekSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API