Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Disney, Judge-.
Since we have found that the petitioner’s gross sales, after discounts of $620.15 for the fiscal year, are $97,769.92, it is apparent therefore that its renegotiable profits are no more than that amount, therefore are less than $500,000, and that the petitioner is, within the language of section 403 (c) (6) of the Renegotiation Act, exempt from renegotiation, unless, under the same section, as the respondent contends, it was “under the control of or controlling or under common control with” Nichols, the renegotiate sales of which were more than $500,000. We, therefore,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Moening v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Hug Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1950