Legal Opinion

American National Insurance v. Lee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action upon insurance policy. Before Judge Hammond. Biehmond superior court. April 19, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. The so-called brief of evidence in this ease consists almost entirely of questions and answers, and contains certain objections to testimony and colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court; and no bona fide effort being made to brief the evidence, it will not be considered. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119); Crumbley v. Brook, 135 Ga. 723 (2), 726 (70 S. E. 655).

2. None of the errors assigned can be determined without reference to a brief of the evidence; and there being no proper brief .of the evidence, the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

By five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crumbley v. BrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Bishop v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Peek v. IrwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Crump v. FarmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Clay v. Austell School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API