Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to rescind a *455deed, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated June 18, 1998, as denied her cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and (c) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and for summary judgment. A triable issue of fact exists as to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gruen v. GruenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re the Estate of SzaboNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Friedman v. SillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Chiaro v. ChiaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Brezinski v. BrezinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shybunko v. Geodesic Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API