Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 9, 2018No. 2:12-cv-07217Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2326 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-07217 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Pending before the court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [ECF No. 16] filed by Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”). The plaintiff has not responded, and the deadline for responding has expired. Thus, this matter is ripe for my review. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. I.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. In Re Guidant Corp. Implantable DefibrillatorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Patricia Freeman v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API