Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Incorporation of Borough of New Morgan

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1989No. Nos. 1343, 1344 and 1345 C.D. 1988Published

1DissentBarry, Judge

I must respectfully dissent to the majority opinion.

The motivation for the incorporation of the Borough of New Morgan, as acknowledged by the court-appointed Borough Advisory Committee and the majority opinion here, was to bypass the zoning and land development restrictions of Robeson and Caernarvon Townships on the uses sought to be developed by Morgantown Properties, i.e., a landfill and trash to steam plant. We agree with the majority that we cannot rely on Two Ponds, Inc. Appeal, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 324, 489 A.2d 939 (1985), to dispose of this question inasmuch as the Court decided that case on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Incorporation of Borough of Seven FieldsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Whitehall Borough Incorporation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. In re Incorporation of the Borough of Two PondsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Michaels Development Co. v. Benzinger Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API