Lay v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Lay was charged by accusation, along with codefendant Jackson, with the offense of theft by shoplifting. A jury trial was waived and defendant was tried separately before the trial court. The trial court found defendant Lay guilty and she appeals. Held:
1. Defendant contends the evidence at trial was not sufficient to authorize her conviction. The State’s evidence shows that defendant and Jackson were observed by a security employee while shopping in a Wal-Mart store. When the security employee walked past the two *656ladies he noted that the items in their…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McWhorter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993