Legal Opinion

Lay v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1987No. 74783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Lay was charged by accusation, along with codefendant Jackson, with the offense of theft by shoplifting. A jury trial was waived and defendant was tried separately before the trial court. The trial court found defendant Lay guilty and she appeals. Held:

1. Defendant contends the evidence at trial was not sufficient to authorize her conviction. The State’s evidence shows that defendant and Jackson were observed by a security employee while shopping in a Wal-Mart store. When the security employee walked past the two *656ladies he noted that the items in their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McWhorter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Livingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Maddox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API