Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Crawford

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1891No. 14854PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The parties to this action wrere oppósing candidates for the office of judge of the superior court of Sonoma County, at the general election of 1890. The respondent, Crawford, received a certificate of election, and this is an action contesting his right thereto.

As a result of the trial and recount in the superior court, it appearing that the defendant received one vote more than the plaintiff, the court, on motion of defendant, granted a nonsuit, and dismissed the proceedings.

The plaintiff appeals from this judgment, and claims that the court erred in counting certain ballots for the *530responde…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People, ex rel. Eastman v. SeamanNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Tracy v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Wyman v. LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re the Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  4. Hicks v. KrigbaumArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Keane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API