Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument and renewal granted and, upon reargument and renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered November 15, 2002 (299 AD2d 856) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is further modified by granting those parts of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims and dismissing those *1018claims (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and by denying as moot that part of plaintiffs cross motion seeking leave to supplement the bill of particulars to allege a violation of 12 NYCRR…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nagel v. D & R REALTY CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Farmer v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Trigen-Syracuse Energy Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Chizh v. Hillside Campus Meadows AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. THOMPSON, WILLIAM R. v. SITHE/INDEPENDENCE LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API