Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McDonald v. McDonald

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 1977No. AA-219Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMills, Acting Chief Judge

I concur in part and dissent in part.

Mr. McDonald appeals from a final judgment dissolving the marriage between him and Mrs. McDonald. He contends the trial court erred in awarding Mrs. McDonald permanent alimony of $350.00 a month and in awarding her exclusive use and occupancy of the family home for two years. I agree.

The purpose of alimony is to provide nourishment, sustenance and the necessities of life to a former spouse who has neither the resources nor the ability to be self-sustaining. In determining a proper award of alimony, the court may consider any factor to do equity and justice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saviteer v. McAdooDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Ranes v. RanesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Davies v. DaviesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API