Fitzgerald v. Knapp Bros., Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Per curiam
The first five assignments of error attack the court’s refusal to correct the finding. Section 567G of the Practice Book requires that “[i]f the appellant desires to have the finding of subor dinate facts corrected, he must, within two weeks after receipt of the finding, file his motion for such correction, and with it such portions of the evidence as he deems relevant and material to the corrections asked for . . . .” Although the appellant moved to correct the finding, he failed to file with the motion a transcript of the evidence as required by § 567G-. “The effort to change the facts by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCulley v. MarinoConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Lomazzo v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duresa v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Duresa v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004