Legal Opinion

Diarra v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 21, 2019No. 18-2821Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2821 Diarra v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jones v. Town of East HavenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Martinez v. SimonettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API