Legal Opinion

State v. Witherspoon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 31, 2002No. SC01-83PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

810 So.2d 871 (2002)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Maynard WITHERSPOON, Respondent.

No. SC01-83.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 31, 2002.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and David H. Foxman and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal on the following question, which the court certified to be of great public importance:

[W]hether, if the reason which…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tripp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Hodgdon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Priester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Witherspoon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Gibson v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Jefferson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API