Legal Opinion

Trosch v. Maryland National Bank

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 1, 1976No. 1263, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

Such immediate attraction as appears in appellant’s argument derives more from its beguiling articulation than from inherent merit. The sole question is whether a trust executed by Ivan E. Trosch simultaneously with his will was in existence at the time of his death, because the residuary clause of his will was subject to that condition precedent:

“I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real, personal and mixed, wheresoever situate and howsoever acquired, unto JEANETTE LEVY and the MARYLAND NATIONAL BANK and their successors, Trustees under Declaration of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hageman v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bircher v. WassonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clymer v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Maimonides School v. ColesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API