Mott v. Lawrence
New York Court of Common Pleas
The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.—Daly, F. J.
The affidavit of the plaintiff was insufficient to warrant the granting of an attachment. The attachment was applied for upon the ground that the defendant was about removing all his property out of the city and county of New York, with the intent of defrauding the defendant who was his creditor, arid the only facts sworn to in the affidavit were, that the defendant closed up his place of business on the 21st of October, 1858, and immediately commenced packing up his goods, and continued packing them up until midnight, ready to be removed; that his store was closed on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vosburgh v. WelchNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Smith v. LuceNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Tallman v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Connell v. LasscellsNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Stewart v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duryea, Watts & Co. v. RaynerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Head v. WollnerNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Townsend v. NebenzahlNew York Supreme Court · 1879