Legal Opinion

State v. Holsing

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. 24334, 24367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] The trial court concluded it did not have jurisdiction to order Jeffrey J. Holsing (Holsing) to pay additional restitution. Accordingly, it dismissed the State’s motion for an order to show cause why Holsing should not be held in contempt for failure to pay restitution. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] On May 26, 1998, Holsing pleaded nolo contendere to three counts of sexual contact with a minor. One of the three victims was R.S. On August 12, 1998, the trial court sentenced Holsing to three concurrent 7-1/2 year terms in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. FordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. ObanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. TuttleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FalkenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. WashingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. MARSHEKSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HolsingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JanesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API