Legal Opinion

Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 10, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHahn, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court granting petitioner’s motion for an allowance and counsel fees, pendente lite.

Appeals from decrees in equity and in causes following the course of equity are regulated by statute. (General Laws, 1923, Chap. 339, Sec. 25 and 34.) In Hemenway v. Hemenway, 28 R. I. 85, the court said: “The right of appeal is only given to the party aggrieved by a final decree. .....Not only is the right of appeal limited to final decrees by section 328 of the court and practice act, but the limitation is emphasized by section 337 of said act,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eidam v. EidamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Mendes v. MendesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Berberian v. BerberianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API