Kajiya v. Department of Water Supply
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BURNS, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs-Appellants (hereinafter plaintiffs or the Kajiyas) argue that the issues of material fact presented below were sufficient to preclude the summary judgment. We agree.
Three questions are presented to us for determination: (1) Whether plaintiffs’ failure to include the Board of Water Supply as a defendant is a fatal jurisdictional defect; (2) Whether the defendants owed a duty to the plaintiffs and if so, what the duty was and whether it was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Columbus, Ga. v. MyszkaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Medeiros v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Runnels v. OkamotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Erbrich Products Co., Inc. v. WillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- City of Jackson v. BallMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Weight v. USAA Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Costales v. RoseteHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.